Backtest Reality Scorecard
Start here ProAssesses whether a trading-bot backtest deserves deeper validation or still resembles an overfit demonstration.
Fresh prompt pack
A pack for checking whether a trading bot backtest is robust enough to move toward paper trading or live execution.
Assesses whether a trading-bot backtest deserves deeper validation or still resembles an overfit demonstration.
Checks whether a backtest accidentally used information that would not have existed at decision time.
Adds real execution costs to a backtest so perfect fills do not hide a fragile strategy.
Prevents users from trusting a high Sharpe ratio, win rate, or profit curve built on too few trades.
Turns a single backtest into rolling in-sample and out-of-sample windows.
Tests sensitivity to trade order, losing streaks, and adverse sequencing.
Checks whether performance depends on one lucky parameter setting instead of a robust zone.
Tests how a bot behaves across volatility, trend, liquidity, and correlation regimes.
Creates objective rules for moving from backtest to paper trading, then to small live size.
Checks whether the backtest universe quietly excluded assets that failed, delisted, or became untradeable.
Defines when a bot should reduce size, stop trading, or require human review after deployment.
Includes pack title, description, subcategories, prompt IDs, difficulty, and prompt text.
A strong equity curve can still come from leakage, overfitting, weak samples, or fills that could not occur in the real market. Use this pack to challenge the test design before interpreting performance or considering deployment.